skip nav
National Prevention Information Network
Search Help
Other Searches: Search Organizations | Search Materials | Search Campaign Resources | Search Funding
español
Share Share this page on Twitter Share this page on Facebook Share this page on LinkedIn View more options to share this page E-mail this page to a colleague Print this page


<< Back

News

Iowa Court Hears Criminal HIV Transmission Case

Abstract
On September 11, the Iowa Court of Appeals heard arguments in a case seeking to overturn the 2009 conviction of a man charged with criminal HIV transmission. The case hinged upon an incident in which the man, who knew he had HIV, failed to disclose his status before having protected sex with another man. The new sexual partner also performed an oral sex act on the HIV-infected man, who did not ejaculate at the time. The new sexual partner later reported the incident to the police. One legal precedent for the case stemmed from the Iowa Supreme Court’s 2006 decision to uphold an HIV-infected man’s conviction for exposing his partner to semen during oral sex. Christopher Clark, a Lambda Legal senior staff attorney, explained why the Iowa Court of Appeals should not follow this precedent. Clark stated that both parties agreed the HIV-infected man did not ejaculate during oral sex, and the HIV-infected man’s viral load was so low it was undetectable, according to his doctor’s tests. CDC has reported reduced risk of HIV transmission through oral sex, and there was no medical consensus on HIV transmission via oral sex without ejaculation. Iowa’s Assistant Attorney General Kevin Cmelik argued that the state’s statute aimed to ensure that HIV-infected people disclosed their status to their sexual partners, who then could make an informed decision about the risk of HIV infection from protected or unprotected sex. Cmelik also argued that a 2001 court ruling that an HIV-infected person could be charged with a crime even if ejaculation did not take place during sex provided a legal basis to dismiss the argument that using a condom meant there was no crime.
Source
http://www.usatoday.com
Date of Publication
09/11/2013
Author
Grant Rodgers
Article Type
General media
Article Category
National News

Disclaimer: NPIN provides this information as a public service only. The views and information provided about the materials, funding opportunities, and organizations do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, or NPIN.

cdcnpin.org News Record #62158

<< Back

CDCNPIN.org

Contact Us
About Us
HIV Content Notice
Privacy Policy
Policies & Disclaimers
Site Index
Help Using the CDC NPIN Web Site

CDC NPIN Searches

Search Organizations
Search Materials
Search Funding Opportunities
Search Campaign Resources
Help Using the CDC NPIN Searches

CDC NPIN Resources

hivtest.cdc.gov
m.hivtest.cdc.gov
findtbresources.org
STD Awareness Microsite
findstdtest.org
AIDS Gov Logo and Link CDC Logo and Link